A lot to take in

Posted by Unknown on Tuesday, September 19, 2006 with No comments
There seems to be a lot of parallel struggle in the context of recovery for pure economic loss in negligence to suitable define the parameters of the debate. Parallel to what? To the patentable subject matter enquiry. The difference is of course that the  judges seem aware of the issues, but policy has lost out. A lot of what Kirby J has said in cases like Cattanach, Perre v Apand, ...
Categories: , ,