Open source biotechnology

Posted by Anton Hughes on Thursday, September 08, 2005 with No comments
A linkfest from a PhD thesis which has been lent to me by for the week.
  • Y. Benkler, "Coase's Penguin, or, Linux and The Nature of The Firm" Yale Law Journal 112(369)
  • Y. Benkler, "'Sharing Nicely': On shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production" Yale Law Journal 114(273)
  • A. Bonaccorsi & C. Rossi (2003) "Why open source software can succeed" Research Policy (32(7):1243-1258
  • Commission on Intellectual Property Rights (2002) Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy November 2002 (2nd edition)
  • K Dau-Schmidt (1997) "Law and Society & Law and Economics: Common Ground, Irreconcilable Differences, New Directions: Economics and Sociology: The Prospects for an Interdisciplinary Discourse on Law" Wisconsin Law Review 1997:389-420
  • P. Drahos (1996) A Philosophy of Intellectual Property Dartmouth Series in Applied Legal Philosophy.
  • W. Eamon "From the Secrets of Nature to Public Knowledge: the Origins of the Concept of Openness in Science" Minerva XXIII(3):321-347
  • R. Eisenberg (1987) "Patents and the Progress of Science: Exclusive Rights and Experimental Use" University of Chicago Law Review 56:1017
  • R.C. Dreyfuss, D. Zimmerman & H. First (eds) Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society , Oxford University Press, Oxford
  • J.T. Ellis, (2000) "Distortion of patent economics by litigation costs". In Proceedings of the 1999 Summit Conference on Intellectual Property, University of Washington, Seattle CASRIP Symposium Publication Series Number 5 http://www.law.washington.edu/casrip/Symposium/Number5/pub5atcl3.pdf"
  • H. Etzkowitz, (1989) "Entrepreneurial science in the academy: a case of the transformation of norms" Social Problems 36(1):14-29
  • N. Franke & M. Schreier (2002) "Entrepreneurial Opportunities with Toolkits for User Innovation and Design" The International Journal on Media Management 4(4):225-235
  • N. Franke & S. Shah(2002) "How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users" Sloan Working Paper #4164, January 2002.
  • N Franke & E. von Hippel "Satisfying heterogeneous needs via innovation toolkits: the case of Apache security software" Research Policy 32:1199-1215
  • R.P. Gabriel & R. Goldman (2004) Open source: beyond the fairytales Free/Open Source Research Community online papers collection. http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/gabrielgoldman.pdf
  • M. Galanter (1974) "Why the 'Haves' Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change" Law and Society Review 9:950-997.
  • N. Gallini & S. Scotchmer (2002) "Intellectual Property: When is it the best incentive system?" In J. Lerner & S. Stern (eds) Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 2 pp51-78. MIT Press, Boston.
  • M. Granovetter (1973) "The Strength of Weak Ties" American Journal of Sociology 78:1360-80.
  • G. Hardin (1968) "Tragedy of the Commons" Science 162:1243-1248
  • D. Harhoff, et al. (2002) "Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit from freely revealing their innovations" http://userinnovation.mit.edu/papers/3.pdf
  • F. Hecker (2000) "Setting Up Shop: The Business of Open Source Software"
  • M. A. Heller (1998) "The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets" Harvard Law Review 111:621
  • C. Herstatt & E. von Hippel (1992) "From experience: developing new product concepts via the lead user method: a case study in a 'low-tech' field" Journal of Product Innovation Management 1992(9)213-221.
  • G. Hertel et al (2003) "Motivation of software developers in open source projects: an internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel" Research Policy 32(7):1159
  • S. Hilgartner & S. I. Brandt-Rauf (1994) "Data Access, Ownership, and Control: Toward Empirical Studies of Access Practices" Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilisation 15(4):355-372
  • L. A. Hollar Legal Protection of Digital Information BNA Books, http://www.bna.com/bnabooks
  • P Hrebejk & T. Bordreau (2001) "The coming 'open monopoly' in software' http://news.com.com/The+coming+open+monopoly+in+software/2010-1071_3-281588.html
  • L.B. Jeppensen (2002) "The Implications of User Toolkits for Innovation"
  • L.B. Jeppensen &  M.J. Molin (2003) "Consumers as co-developers: learning and innovation outside the firm"
  • G. Keizer (2004) "Linux to ring up $35B by 2008" TechWeb News Dec 16 http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=55800672
  • C.A. Kenwood (2001)  A business case study of open source software Report on OSS for the US DoD, MP 0 1B 0000048, The Mitre Corporation
  • E. E. Kim "An Introduction to Open Source Communities" Blue Oxen Associates http://www.blueoxen.org/research/00007/BOA-00007.pdf
  • E.W. Kitch (1977) "The Nature and Function of the Patent System" Journal of Law and Economics 20:265-290
  • T.S. Kuhn (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • K. Lakhani & E von Hippel (2002) "How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User to User Assistance" Research Policy 1451:1-21
  • J.O. Lanjouw & M. Schankerman (2001) "Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition" RAND Journal of Economics 32(1) (Spring): 129-151
  • L. Laudan (1982) "Two puzzles about Science: reflections on some crises in the philosophy and sociology of science" History of Sciecnce 20:253-268
  • J Lerner (2000) "Patent policy innovations: a clinical examination" Symposium: 'Taking Stock: The Law and Economics of Intellectual Property Rights'Vanderbilt Law Review 53(6):1841-1856
  • R.C. Levin (1986) "A new look at the patent system" American Economic Review 76(2):200
  • S. Levy Hackers: Heroes of the computer revolution, Anchor/Doubleday, New York
  • C. Long (2000) "Proprietary rights and why initial allocations matter" Emory Law Journal 49(3):823-836
  • P.L. Loughlan (1998) Intellectual Property: Creative and Marketing Rights LBC Information Services, Sydney.
  • C. Luthje (2000) Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field: an empirical study of sport-related product consumers. MIT Sloan School of Management. Working Paper No 4331-02.
  • T. Mandeville (1996) Understanding Novelty: Information, Technological Change and the Patent System. Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey.
  • E. Mansfield (1985) "How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out?" Journal of Industrial Economics 34:217-223.
  • E Marshall (2001) "Bermuda Rules: Community Spirit, With Teeth" Science 291(5507):1192
  • S. Maurer (2001) "Inside the Anticommons: Academic Scientists' Struggle to Commercialise Human Mutations Data, 1999-2001" In Conference on the Capital, Economics and History of Intellectual Property. Haas School of Business, Berkeley, California.
  • S. Maurer et al (2004) "Finding Cures for Tropical Disease: Is Open Source the Answer?" Public Library of Science: Medicine August, 2004. Available at http:/www.cptech.org/ip/health/rnd/opendevelopment.html
  • K.W. McCain, (1991) "Communication, Competition, and Secrecy: the Production and Dissemination of Research-Related Information in Genetics" Science, Technology and Human Values 16(4):491-516.
  • R.P. Merges, (1996) "Contracting into Liability Rules: Intellectual Property Rights and Collective Rights Organisations" California Law Review 84:1293
  • R.P. Merges (2000) "Intellectual property rights and the new institutional economics" Vanderbilt Law Review 53(6):1857
  • R. P. Merges (2001) "Institutions for intellectual property transactions: the case of patent pools" In Dreyfus & Zimmerman
  • R. P. Merges & R. R. Nelson (1990) "On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope" Columbia Law Review 90:888.
  • R.K Merton (1957) "The Normative Structure of Science"
  • P.B. Meyer (2003) "Episodes of Collective Invention" BLS Working Papers Working Paper 368, US Department of Labour Bureau of Labor Statistics Office of Productivity and Technology.
  • E. Moglen (2003) Questioning SCO: A Hard Look at Nebulous Claims. http://www.osdl.org/newsroom/articles/ebenmoglenpositionpaper/redirect_link
  • J.Y. Moon & L Sproull (2001) "Turning Love into Money: How some firms may profit from voluntary electronic communities" http://userinnovation.mit.edu/papers/Vol-Customers.pdf
  • M. Morgan (2002) "Data Release Issues Illustrated by Some Major Public-Private Research Consortia" In Symposium on the Role of Scientific and Technical Data and Information in the Public Domain National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC, 5-6 September 2002.
  • P. Morrison, et al (20020 "The Nature of Lead Users and Measurement of Leading Edge Status" http://userinnovation.mit.edu/papers/4.pdf
  • M Mulkay (1980) "Interpretation and the Use of Rules: the Csae of the Norms of Science' Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences (series ii) 39:111-125
  • M Mulkay (1976) "Norms and ideology in science" Sociology of Scientific Information 15(4/5):637
  • A.M. Muniz & T.C. O'Guinn (2001) "Brand Community" Journal of Consumer Research 27:412-432
  • R. Nelson What is public and what is private about technology? Center for Research In Management, Unvierstiy of California at Berkeley. Consortium on Competitiveness and Cooperation., Working Paper No. 90-9.
  • R Nelson & R. Mazzoleni, (1997) Economic Theories About the Costs and benefits of Patents" In NR Council (ed) Intellectual Property Rights and Research Tools in Molecular Biology, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
  • W. Norhaus (1969) Invention, Growth and Welfae: A Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.
  • C. Nottenburg et al (2002) "Accessing Other People's Technology for Non-Profit Research" Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 46(3):389
  • H. Nowotny & K Taschwer (eds) (1996) The Sociology of the Sciences Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham
  • A Nuvolari (2001) "Collective Invention during the British Industrial Revolution: The Case of the Cornish Pumping Engine" http://fp.tm.tue.nl/ecis/Working
  • S O'Mahony "Guarding the commons: how community managed software projects protect their work" Research Policy 32(7):1179
  • D.W. Opderbeck (2004) "The penguin's genome, or Coase and open source biotechnology" http://ssrn.com/abstract=574804
  • E Ostrom, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • M. Porter, "Strategy and the Internet" Harvard Business Review 79(3):63-80
  • A. Rai (2003) "Collective Action and Technology Transfer: The Case of "Low Value" Research"  In Conference on International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology under a Globalised Intellectual Propery Regime, April 4-6, 2003, Duke Law School, Durham, North Carolina, http://www.law.duke.edu/trips/webcast.html
  • J.H. Reichman & P.F. Uhlir (2002) "Promoting Public Good Uses of Scientific Data: A Contractually Restructured Commons for Science and Innovation" http://www.law.duke.edu/pd/papers/RechmanandUhlir.pdf
  • N Rosenberg (1982) Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • P. Samuelson (2001) "Digital Information, Digital Networks, and the Public Domain" In Conference on the Public Domain, Duke University School of Law, Durham, North Carolina, November 9-11,2001. Duke University
  • S. Scotchmer (1991) "Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law" Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1):29-41.
  • A. Silverman (1995) "The Relationship Between Basic and Improvement Patents" Journal of Minerals, Metals and Materials 47(10):50.
  • J. Sulston & G. Ferry (2002) The Common Thread  Random House, London.
  • C.R. Sunstein "Social Norms and Social Roles" Columbia Law Review 96:903
  • N. Thompson (2002) "May the Source Be With You" The Washington Monthly Online July/August 2002:1-5.
  • E von Hippel (1988) Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • E von Hippel (1994) "'Sticky Information' and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation" Management Science 40(4):429
  • E. von Hippel (2002) "Horizontal Innovation Networks - by and for Users" http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/vonhippel3.pdf
  • E von Hippel & G von Krogh (2001) "Open Source Software and a 'Private-Collective' Innovation Model: Issues for Organisation Science" http://opensource.mit.edu/hippelkrogh.pdf
  • G von Krogh et al (2003) "Community, joining and specialisation in open source software innovation: a case study" Research Policy 32(7):1217
  • G von Krogh & E von Hippel (2003) "Special issue on open source software development" 32(7):1149
  • S. Weber (2004) The Success of Open Source. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  • J West (2003) "How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies" Research Policy 32(7):1259
  • S. Williams (2002) Free as in Freedom: Richard Stallman's Crusade for Free Software. O'Reilly.